|
QUOTE OF THE WEEK: ON FEES VS. TAXES
“The governor has saddled the state with a billion dollars in new hidden taxes just to protect his relationship with a special interest group. Minnesotans deserve better.”
- Minnesota DFL chair Brian Melendez (Star Tribune, “State fees found taxing to some; State taxes may not have gone up, but fees have soared, according to a report from non-partisan Senate staff,” January 26, 2006.) |

|
Pawlenty Unplugged Facts about Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty www.pawlentyunplugged.com |
|
Contact : webmaster@pawlentyunplugged.com |
|
FLIP-FLOP ON ETHANOL
FLIP: Governor Pawlenty in 2003 slashed $20 million in ethanol subsidies from the State’s budget. (Star Tribune, “Where the cuts will hit hardest; Ethanol: $20.1 Million; Corn growers and factories say they feel plowed under,” February 8, 2003.)
FLOP: After being criticized by corn farmers, Governor Pawlenty the next year sought to reinvent himself by announcing a 20 percent ethanol content mandate. (Senate Majority Research Memorandum, “Governor Pawlenty’s Changing Positions on Ethanol,” October 8, 2004.) |
|
FLIP FLOP ON THE FAMILY FARMER FLIP: Tim Pawlenty claims he is a friend of the family farmer.
FLOP: Pawlenty ha s consistent record of supporting large, corporate farmers over independent, family farmers. In 1998, legislator Pawlenty voted to allow the expansion of large corporate-style feedlots. Two years later, he blocked an amendment to expand agricultural assistance to farmers statewide. In 2001, as House Majority Leader, he voted down an amendment to ensure fair milk prices for dairy farmers. As Governor, Pawlenty formed a task force loaded with agri-business corporations to advise him on livestock issues--the task force recommended usurpation of local control over feedlot sitings. |
Big Question: When can politicians use words like 'weenies?'
Gov. Tim Pawlenty took a star turn on the Big Question blog last week with his unexpected (but not unprecedented) word choice. Talking to national reporters, Pawlenty described Republicans who run away from President Bush this year as "weenies." A Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee press release treated the remark as a direct reference to Republican U.S. Senate candidate Mark Kennedy -- an unfair leap into creative writing. In the incident, we also see Pawlenty's subtler political talents on display. You use a word like "weenie" and you know you'll be quoted, and you know you'll come across as a funny, candid pol who talks like a regular guy. It worked. Finally you also see a gift that not all politicians can manage: recycling a well-traveled line while making it sound fresh. How do we know Pawlenty's "weenie" remark has been around the block before? Here's an excerpt from an October Star Tribune story: "I don't embrace everything Bush says," he [Pawlenty] said. ..."But politics is smarmy enough without people bailing out on friends just because times are tough. That's a weenie move." For more on "weenie redux," or to join the fray, please visit www.startribune.com/blogs/ bigquestion/ |
![Text Box: PAWLENTY’S FLIP-FLOP ON CORPORATE WRONGDOING
Flip: Pawlenty says during his campaign for governor (at the height of the Wall Street corporate scandals) that he has “no tolerance” for wrongdoing or deceptive practices by business officials.1
Flop: Pawlenty not only tolerates corporate fraud by his closest associates, he even appoints some of them to important governmental posts despite their wrongdoing:
Pawlenty appoints longtime political ally Vicki Grunseth to the Metropolitan Airports Commission, touting her private business experience.2 What experience is that? Grunseth was an executive of New Access Communications and founder of QAI.3 Both companies were sanctioned by numerous states for consumer fraud, and Grunseth was even personally sued by at least one state before Pawlenty appointed her.4 Grunseth was also director of finance of TelEurope Ltd. and on its board.5 The Australian Securities and Investments Commission halted the sale of that company’s securities on several occasions for providing deceptive and misleading information to investors.6 The sales were intended to raise money for New Access and its parent, NewTel. Pawlenty was on the three person NewTel board until December, 2001.
Pawlenty draws $10,000 for serving on the three person board of directors of a telecom company whose largest operating subsidiary is ripping off consumers. (Click here to read more.) Pawlenty says he didn’t know of the fraud. City Pages says of the Governor’s denials: “[E]verybody knows the [telecom] industry regularly plays crooked—except Tim Pawlenty. Like Claude Rains in Casablanca, he is shocked. Shocked!”7
Pawlenty appoints his campaign manager to a top position at the Commerce Department in which he was responsible to regulate the telecom industry, even though the manager had previously been found by the Minnesota courts to have engaged in telemarketing fraud. (Click here to read more.)
Pawlenty’s campaign treasurer is found by an administrative law judge to have engaged in deception through an equity-stripping enterprise in which he duped unsuspecting homeowners in foreclosure of their home equity. The Pawlenty Commerce Department imposes no fine. (Click here to read more.)
Pawlenty allows one of his closest political associates to help select the Commerce Commissioner, who regulates the telecom industry in Minnesota, even though that associate’s telecom companies had been sanctioned by regulators in many states for consumer fraud. (Click here to read more.)
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida gives $15,000 to the Republican Party. The Pawlenty Administration then settles a case with American Bankers on terms significantly more favorable than offered during the Ventura Administration. The insurer pays $1,000,000 to settle criminal charges that it made an illegal corporate political contribution.
1“A $250K Helping Hand To Pawlenty Campaign,” Star Tribune, 1B, August 13, 2002.
2“NewTel Stock Valuation Questioned – Australia Halts The Sale of Teleurope Securities,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, A4, August 1, 2003.
3“Happenings In Minnesota’s 2003 Legislative Session,” Associated Press, January 9, 2003.
4“Politicians’ Telecoms Wronged Consumers” and “QAI: A Legacy of Success or Slams?,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, July 13, 2003.
5NewTel Stock Valuation Questioned – Australia Halts The Sale of Teleurope Securities,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, A4, August 1, 2003; “More Questions About Firm That Has ties To Newtel,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, C1, August 27, 2003.
6NewTel Stock Valuation Questioned – Australia Halts The Sale of Teleurope Securities,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, A4, August 1, 2003; NewTel Stock Valuation Questioned – Australia Halts The Sale of Teleurope Securities,” St. Paul Pioneer Press, A4, August 1, 2003.
7“Secrets and Lies: Why Telegate Matters,” City Pages, p. 16, July 23, 2003.](index_files/image2005.gif)





![Text Box: IS THERE A TWELVE STEP PROGRAM FOR FLIP-FLOPS?
Flip: Representative Pawlenty: “As to the type of taxes that might be increased in emergency circumstances, very small increases on a variety of taxes should be considered to avoid disproportionate impact by any one tax-paying sector of the state’s economy.” (Pioneer Press 10/13/92).
Flop: According to the StarTribune, “The cost of government in Minnesota today is significantly lower than a decade ago, but the little guy is picking up a greater share of the tab. Put simply, taxes - in particular, property taxes - are growing faster than the incomes of most. But the incomes of Minnesota’s most prosperous residents have climbed faster than the cost of state and local government.” . . . “[A state analysis] projects for 2007 effective Minnesota tax rates - after federal taxes - ranging from 6.8 percent for people with incomes of $323,340 or more to 18.1 percent for people with incomes of $8,344 to $14,056.”](index_files/image1989.gif)
